Friday, August 25, 2017

Signal Boost 4 - Joseph Hayne Rainey 1832-1887; Represntative of South Carolina 1870-1879

As I have mentioned in prior posts, this project is more about personal accountability, I want to do something for myself that counteracts the disproportionate amount of attention of the voices of white supremacist. I have committed to do 365 posts (not every day, so this project could take years), to do the work to learn more about people of color, Jewish people, and movements for social justice and to do so in a manner that seeks to amplify/signal boost those people and those voices. To that end, I've created a static webpage - Signal Boost Supplement - Better Sources than Me. I will try to update this page with resources I come across.

Now onto Signal Boost 4 (again, my primary source is Black Americans in Congress 1870-2007, please check it out as it has much more vibrant information):

Joseph Hayne Rainey is one of those interesting complex people. He was born enslaved. His father was a barber and the person who enslaved him "allowed" him to work for wages, so long as he paid some of the wages back. He was able to buy his family's freedom in the early 1840s, and approximately a decade later, enslaved two males for his family.
Rainey served for the Confederate Army in 1861, escaping to Bermuda, a British colony that abolished the practice of enslaving human beings in 1834. He stayed there through the Civil War, returning to Charleston in 1866, with enough wealth acquired in Bermuda to "elevate his status in the community."

Quick Facts About his Political Life:

  • 1868 - participated in the South Carolina constitutional convention as a representative of Georgetown.
  • 1869 Attended a state labor commission.
  • 1869 - Official census taker.
  • 1870 - Won a seat to the state senate, immediately becoming a chairman of the finance committee.
  • 1870 - Appointed to fill the seat left vacant due to Rep. Benjamin F. Whitemore's resignation amidst a scandal about getting paid for appointments to U.S. military academies.
  • 1870 Won the full term by 63% and later by 86%.
  • Was unopposed for the 43rd Congress.
  • 1872 -Ran a race against another Black candidate (Samuel Lee), winning by 52%, his opponent challenged the result because some people spelled Rainey's last name incorrectly. 
  • Won the seat in the 45th Congress against Democrat John S. Richardson by 52%. Richardson accused the Rainey and the Republicans of voter intimidation because of the presence of federal troops during the election. 
  • March 3, 1879 - Rainey retired from the House, after being defeated by John S. Richardson, a Democrat by more than 8,000 votes. 
Highlighted Parts of his political career: 
  • 1871, in his first major speech, argued for the use of federal troops to protect Southern Blacks from the recently organized Ku Klux Klan. After the act passed, he had to argue for it to actually get funded. 
  • He favored desegregating schools, but also favored a poll tax for schools, which many at the time thought would exclude people recently emancipated from enslavement. 
  • He was the first Black American to preside of the House of Representatives (as a Speaker pro term in April or May of 1874). 
  • Generally opposed restricting the influx of Asian immigrants to the U.S. 
  • After a July 4. 1876 tragedy where black militia celebrated by parading through the streets in Hamburg, South Carolina and white men fired upon them, killing several militiamen, Rainey condemned the murders and exchanged coarse remarks with Democratic Representative Samuel Cox of New York who had propounded the believe that the "Hamburg massacre" was the fault of Black South Carolina leaders. 
Quotes from this speech from https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Joseph_Hayne_Rainey

    • ... if it had not been for the blasting effects of slavery, whose deadly pall has so long spread its folds over this nation, to the destruction of peace, union, and concord. Most particularly has its baneful influence been felt in the south, causing the people to be at once restless and discontented. Even now, sir, after the great conflict between slavery and freedom, after the triumph achieved at such a cost, we can yet see the traces of the disastrous strife and the remains of disease in the body-politic of the south. In proof of this witness the frequent outrages perpetrated upon our loyal men. The prevailing spirit of the southron is either to rule or to ruin. Voters must perforce succumb to their wishes or else risk life itself in the attempt to maintain a simple right of common manhood." 

    •  I could dwell upon the sorrows of poor women, with their helpless infants, cast upon the world, homeless and destitute, deprived of their natural protectors by the red hand of the midnight assassin. I could appeal to you, members upon this floor, as husbands and fathers, to picture to yourselves the desolation of your own happy firesides should you be suddenly snatched away from your loved ones. Think of gray-haired men, whose fourscore years are almost numbered, the venerated heads of peaceful households, without warning murdered for political opinion's sake
  • Speech in Favor of Civil Rights of 1875
... I am somewhat surprised to perceive that on this occasion, when the demand is made upon Congress by the people to guarantee those rights to a race heretofore oppressed, we should find gentlemen on the other side taking another view of the case from which they professed in the past. The gentleman from Kentucky [Mr. Beck] has taken a legal view of this question, and he is undoubtedly capable of taking that view. I am not a lawyer, and consequently I cannot take a legal view of this matter, or perhaps I cannot view it through the same optics that he does. I view it in light of the Constitution - in light of the amendments that have been made to  that Constitution; I view it in the light of humanity; I view in the light of the progress and civilization which are now rapidly marching over this country. We, sirs, would not ask of this Congress as a people that they should legislate for us specifically as a class if we could only have those rights which this bill is designed to give us accorded us without this enactment. I can very well understand the opposition to this measure by gentlemen on the other side of the House, and especially of those who come from the South. They have a feeling against the negro in this country that I suppose will never die out. They have an antipathy against that race of people, because of their loyalty to this Government, and because at the very time when they were needed to show their manhood and valor they came forward in defense of the flag of the country and assisted in crushing out the rebellion. They, sir, would not give the colored man the right to vote or the right to enjoy any of those immunities which are enjoyed by other citizens, if it had a tendency to make him feel his manhood and elevate him above the ordinary way of life. So long as he makes himself content with ordinary gifts, why it is all well; but when e aspires to be a man, when he seeks to have the rights accorded him that other citizens in the country enjoy then he is asking too much and such gentlemen as the gentlemen from the Kentucky are not willing to grant it.  
... just as soon as we begin to assert our manhood and demand our rights we are looked upon as men not worthy to be recognized, we become objectionable, we become obnoxious, and we hear this howl about social equality.  
...We do not ask the passage of any law forcing us upon anybody who does not want to receive us. But we do want a law enacted that we may be recognized like other men in the country. Why is it that colored members of Congress cannot enjoy the same immunities that are accorded to white members? Why cannot we stop at hotels here without meeting objection? Why cannot we go into restaurants without being insulted? We are here enacting laws for the country and casting votes upon important questions; we have been sent here by the suffrages of the people, and why cannot we enjoy the same benefits that are accorded to our white colleagues on this floor? 
I say to you, gentlemen, that you are making a mistake. Public opinion is aroused on this question. I tell you that the negro will never rest until he gets his rights. We ask them because we know it is proper, not because we want to deprive any other class of the rights and immunities they enjoy, because they are granted to us by the law of the land. Why this discrimination against us when we enter public conveyances or places of public amusement? Why is a discrimination made against us in the churches; and why in the cemeteries when we go to pay that last debt of nature that brings us all upon a level? 
Gentlemen, I say to you this discrimination must cease. We are determined to fight this question; we believe the Constitution gives us this right. All of the fifteen amendments made to the Constitution run down in one single line of protecting the rights of the citizens of this country. One after another of those amendments give these rights to citizens; step by step these rights are secured to them. And now we say to you that if you will not obey the Constitution, then the power is given by that Constitution for the enactment of such a law as will have a tendency to enforce the provisions thereof.







Monday, August 21, 2017

Signal Boost 3 - Dick Gregory 1932-2017

Just a reminder to anyone coming across this blog without knowing anything about my project. Signal Boost is my effort to commit to 365 posts of learning about People, including women, of Color, Jewish people, and movements for social justice. The idea of the project came from being tired of media was amplifying the voices of white supremacists and craving to hear the sides all to often left out.

It's only day three and I'm doing something I didn't want to do, take a short cut and write about someone getting significant national attention. I am making the exception already because this project is about educating myself and I did not really know of Dick Gregory before. I was listening to DemocracyNow!, the best source I've ever found for  news that centers voices of activists and people of color and they dedicated their show to this man and I was simply blown away (not unexpectedly, when you see the images of the Civil Rights Movement, we know there are a lot of unsung heroes who put their lives on the lines over and over again who will never get proper credit for their roll in making this country live up to its ideals).

Dick Gregory was comedian and activist. I'm not a huge fan of comedy because it so often takes shortcuts with homophobia, sexism, racism, ablebodism, etc., etc. Listening to him speak, here is a man that mentioned problems of intimate violence multiple times in his interview. Not as a joke, but as a serious commentary on the problems in our world.

Here's one example from the DemocracyNow! transcript

Alcohol consumption, right now, as we talk right now is about 34 percent higher than it was before Ground Zero. Now, what do this mean? It mean get ready for battered wives. If, before Ground Zero, every four seconds in America a woman got beat up by her boyfriend or husband — not strangers, people she know — then think about what happens now with the amount of alcohol and drug consumption that’s out here. 
What he did to open doors for Black comedians is incredibly important. But what turns my head was his remarkable lifelong quest for justice.  He marched and integrated lunch counters, and schools. He protested the Vietnam War:
No, nonviolence to me means not that I’m not supposed to hit American white man, nonviolence mean to me that death might put me on its payroll, but I’ll never put death on my payroll.
 And this thought on police brutality:
Let me say this, never before in the history of this planet have anybody made the progress that African-Americans have made in a 30 year period, in spite of black folks and white folks — the now — the number one problem we confronted with now is police brutality. Now am I saying police brutality is worse today than it was 50 years ago? No. Then what has has changed? My mindset. There’s things I would have tolerated 50 years ago, that I won’t tolerate. 

 In addition to DemocracyNow! Tributes to Dick Gregory are available at NPR  and the New York Times. 

I learned from the NYT he is an author and Goodreads author page lists the following books that he authored - so in the spirit of Signal Boosting, check out his own books.

As someone not into comedy, it didn't even occur to me there would be audio collections, but there are some- check out this link fro Amazon. 

Sunday, August 20, 2017

Signal Boost 2 - Hiram Rhodes Revels, 1827-1901; U.S. Senator from 1870-1871

As I have mentioned in prior posts, this project is more about personal accountability to do the work to learn more about people of color, Jewish people, and movements for social justice and to do so in a manner that seeks to amplify/signal boost those people and those voices. To that end, I've created a static webpage - Signal Boost Supplement - Better Sources than Me. I will try to update this page with resources I come across.

Now onto Signal Boost 2 (again, my primary source is Black Americans in Congress 1870-2007, please check it out as it has much more vibrant information):

Hiram Rhodes Revels, 1927 -1901, served as a United States Senator from 1870 to 1871. He was a Republican from Mississippi (most of the first Black people to serve in office were Republicans, because the Republican party was the party that lead the charge to end the enslavement of human beings).

Personal Quick Facts: 

  • Born Fayetteville, North Carolina, September 27, 1827; 
  • Parents were not enslaved and he claimed his ancestors, "as far back as my knowledge extends, were free). 
    • Father - Baptist preacher; Mother of Scottish Decent.
    • Scottish background, African and Croatan Indian lineage
  • Went to a school taught by a free black woman and worked for a few years as a barber. 
    • Complete his education at Beech Grove Quaker Seminary in Liberty Indiana, 
    • The Darke County Seminary for black students in Ohio; 
    • Knox College in Galesburg, Illinois (he was one of the few college-educated black men of the time). 
  • Ordained in African Methodist Episcopal (AME) church; 
  • Married to Phoebe A. Bass, a free black woman, and had six daughters.
  • While preaching at an AME church in St. Louis, he was imprisoned for preaching to the black community (It was illegal for free blacks to live in Missouri). 
  • In 1862, when the Civil War broke out, he helped recruit two black regiments and served as a chaplain. 
  • In 1863 he established a freedom school in St. Louis, Missouri. 
  • He settled in Natchez Mississippi in 1866.
  • He died of a stroke on January 16, 1901,
Political Quick Facts
  • Elected as Natchez alderman in 1868; 
  • 1869 won a seat in the Mississippi state senate (Revels was one of more than 30 Black legislators out of 140 state legislators. As of 2017, there are 51 Black Legislators, 38 in the House and 13 in the Senate.) 
  • Revels was chosen by the legislature in a vote that was 85 to 15 to fill the one year term for Senator (that was the remaining amount on a vacated seat before election);
  • Senate Democrats sought to prevent Revels from being sworn in citing, inter alia, that Revels was not a U.S. Citizen until the 14th Amendment in 1868 and therefore ineligible to become a U.S. Senator. 
  • Quote from Nevada Senator James Nye:
What a magnificent spectacle of retributive justice is witnessed here today! In place of that proud defiant man who marched out to trample under foot the Constitution and the laws of the country  he had sworn to support, comes back one of that humble race whom he would have enslaved forever to take and occupy his seat upon this floor.
  • Served on the Committee on Education and Labor and the Committee on the District of Columbia 
  • Argued before the House that the North and the Republican Party owed Georgian Black Legislators their support (Georgians elected 29 black legislators to its house and 3 to its senate and Democrats and moderate Republicans attempted to block their ability to be seated, claiming that the state constitution did no permit black officeholders. The Georgia legislature eventually agreed to a congressional mandate reinstating the legislators as a requirement for rejoining the Union. 
  • Advocated against legal separation of the races, believing it led to animosity.
  • In early 1871, successfully appealed to the War Department on behalf of Black mechanics from Baltimore who were barred from working at the U.S. Navy Yard. 

Additional Important Information learned while writing this blog: 
From Smart PoliticsAfrican-American US Representatives by the Numbers - By Dr. Eric Ostermeier August 28, 2013


  • As of August 2013, 25 states have yet to elect an African-American to the U.S. House and 49 percent of the total number of U.S. House elections won by blacks in history have come from five states: New York, California, Illinois, Michigan, and Georgia.
  • The percentage of House seats won by African-Americans has increased during each subsequent 10-year redistricting period culminating with the 43 black U.S. Representatives (9.8 percent) who have been elected to serve in the U.S. House for the 113th Congress (although two did not serve: Jesse Jackson, who resigned, and Tim Scott, who was appointed to the U.S. Senate). 
  • States that have never elected an African American to the U.S. House are spread out across all four regions of the country (regions as designated by the U.S. Census Bureau):
    · Five states in the Midwest: Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota

    · Five states in the Northeast: Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont

    · Four states in the South: Arkansas, Delaware, Kentucky, and West Virginia.

    · Eleven states in the West: Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
  • States that have elected the largest number of Black Representatives:
                  Maryland
                  South Carolina (most of these were Republican, which makes me wonder if it was post-Reconstruction) 
                  Florida
                  Georgia
  • The only Republicans to serve in the 20th or 21st Centuries were Oscar De Priest of Illinois, Gary Franks of Connecticut, Tim Scott of South Carolina, J.C. Watts of Oklahoma, and Allen West of Florida.

Saturday, August 19, 2017

Signal Boost 1 - The Original Black Caucus of Congress

In the last year there's been a troupe going around that black people did not get the vote until the 1960s. I understand where the thought comes from,because white people fought like hell to take away the rights of Black Men (until 1920 and then also Black Women) to vote. But it is a pet peeve of mine because (1) it is legally and factually inaccurate; (2) it white-washes history; (3) it makes invisible the backlash and intentional efforts of white people to take away the voting rights of black people; (4) it helps maintain a culture where we need a Voting Rights Act to try and protect constitutional rights. 

The Fifteenth Amendment is unequivocal: 
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

Efforts to deny the right to vote should have been unconstitutional (and still should be, including any and all laws which do not allow people to immediately have their voting rights back after they have finished any criminal sentence). 
My first series of Signal Boosts is going to be about the members of Congress elected after enslaving other human beings was finally abolished. My source of information is "Black Americans in Congress 1870-2007." This was prepared under the direction of The Committee on House Administration for the U.S. House of Representatives and lists Robert A. Brady, Chairman and Vernon J. Ehlers, Ranking Minority Member. Despite being a paper back book, it is heavier than most of my law school books and packed with information. 
The book identifies what it calls "The Symbolic Generation" - a group of 17 Black Congressional Represented (yes all "Congressmen" but I believe in using gender neutral terms), including eight formally enslaved people were in Congress. They specifically worked to improve the lives of their black constituents and all black people in the U.S. 
According to the book, they had three primary goals: providing education, enforcing political rights, and extending opportunities to enable economic independence. 
The First Black Members of Congress were: 
  • Hiram Roach, Senate
  • Jefferson Long, House
  • Joseph Rainey, House
  • Benjamin Turner, House
  • Robert DeLarge, House
  • Robert Elliott, House
  • Josiah Walls, House
  • Richard Cain, House
  • John Lynch, House
  • Alonso Ransier, House
  • John Hyman, House 
  • Charles Nash, House
  • Robert Smalls, House
  • James O'Hara, House
My future posts will be about these men. About providing a signal boost for their legacy. 

Signal Boost - Series

Signal Boost Project - I am sick of the white supremacists getting too much airtime. I want to signal boost the lives of people of color and Jews to combat white supremacy. I want to do this to push myself to learn more, and to do it through more than just listening to amazing podcasts. This project is mainly for me, but if you get something out of it great. But if you're pressed for time, don't read my blog. Instead please explore some of my favorite podcasts: Another Round with Heben and Tracy - created by BuzzFeeed (two Black Women interview amazing people and their podsquad puts together a fabulous Newsletter - read that instead); Code Switch on NPR with Gene Dempsy (Black Male) and Shereen Marisol Meraji (" a native Californian with family roots in Puerto Rico and Iran"). These Podcasts, along with their guests will say smarter things than I ever will.

Who am I?
If you somehow stumble across this blog and you are not one of my friends who found it because I mentioned it on Facebook, allow me to tell you enough about myself so you can understand where this project is coming from.

In the wake of election and particularly the rise of white supremacists being granted far too much airtime I have wondered what I can do. I have been passionate about social justice issues for as long as I can remember. Despite being white, I have also been aware of the festering problem of white supremacists groups. I read some of the Turner Diaries in high school - I cannot remember why, just that the overall project was about how this was horrifying and they were based in the PNW, where
I'm from, so any notion that racism was a Southern Problem was completely shattered).

In high school, we had a section of "hicks" that believed they should be allowed to fly the confederate flag in their trucks pretending it was some sort of "state's rights" statement. They refused to listen to people telling them how uncomfortable and how unsafe it made them.

In college, I took Women As Revolutionaries in college and fell in love with Angela Davis. I took minority Women Playwrights and fell in love with the way that art can connect us for a moment in the lives of those who are different from us and connect us to our overall humanity. I remember learning about intersectional feminism and altered the motto that thread it's way through my women's college from remembering to always ask, "Where are the women?" to always asking "Where are the women of color?"

I have had children in my life who are kids of color. I have realized that if I am going to buy books for my nephew, nieces, or step kids that I cannot just show up at a book store, I have to go to library book sales (okay, I love library book sales, so this is only a hardship because I've never been a prior planner), I have to go online. I have to do research.

Having been married to a Jewish woman and her having the most amazing little Black boy, I also learned that world is organized for straight haired people like myself. People would literally stop my ex-wife to ask her about what products she used. Even in all my attempts at being woke, I never had an understanding of the daily issues of not having the products for your body/hair readily available. One of those moments where the ivory tower part of my mind got better context. I had read cases about Black Women not being able to proceed with an employment discrimination case because of how they wore their hair (braids) and understood that it was a biased decision to say that black men couldn't do it and white women couldn't do it, so it couldn't violate non-discrimination laws to say that black women couldn't do it, but I never understood just how complicated hair can be on a personal level.

I heard a judge speak at an event once, she was a woman of color. She said that it isn't that people of color on the bench make better legal decisions, it's simply that they have a better understanding of a different set of facts and you can only properly apply the law when you fully understand the facts. I cannot understand the facts by living any different experience. I can however, work hard to educate myself about the lives and struggles of others.

That is the reason for this project. Signal Boost is going to be a project where I do 365 blogs (I'm not saying a year's worth of blogs, because I may not do it every day, life happens, but I want to do what would be a years worth of blogs).  The focus of the blogs is going to be to learn more about people and organizations that do work for racial and social justice. The focus is going to be on people of color and Jewish people. To do one thing that continues to push me to never stop working on myself and to add at least one more idea in the market place of ideas to make it so racism and antisemitism are drowned out. So that ideas of social justice and equality rise to the top and stay there.

I have also added a page to keep track of Podcasts, Books, Movies, etc. that I would like to signal boost. You can find that page here.